The Unjust Economy
is an unjust society which is built
upon an unjust economy. That is its foundation. Like every other worldly empire. It isn't that Americans are worse than other
people. Americans are other people. They are a representative cross section of
the human race. And they exhibit the
same fallen nature. And the empire
brings out the worst in us. One of the
grand illusions which belongs to the false faith of the America Cult is that America
is somehow unique and exceptional: our turds don't stink, unlike the rest of the
world. Once you arrive in
America--assuming you are here legally--you begin to produce a pure white
product like ivory soap which has a faint lilac fragrance.
John Henry Newman once said: Earthly kingdoms are founded, not in
justice, but in injustice. They are
created by the sword, by robbery, cruelty, perjury, craft and fraud. There never was a kingdom, except Christ's,
which was not conceived and born, nurtured and educated, in sin. There never was a state, but was committed to
acts and maxims, which it is its crime to maintain and its ruin to
abandon. What monarchy is there but
began in invasion or usurpation ? What
revolution has been effected without self-will, violence or hypocrisy ? What popular government but is blown about by
every wind, as if it had no conscience and no responsibilities ? What dominion of the few but is selfish and
unscrupulous ? Where is military
strength without the passion for war ?
Where is trade without the love of filthy lucre, which is the root of
all evil ? (from: "Sanctity the Token of the Christian
Empire" in Sermons on Subjects of the Day
an earlier period we have the classic statement of brutal realism with which
John Fitzgibbon, Lord Clare, tried to quieten the liberal posturing of his
fellow Ango-Irish landowners in 1789: The
Act by which most of us hold our estates was an Act of violence--an Act
subverting the first principles of the Common Law. The essay on IRELAND in the 9th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica describes
the effect upon Ireland of the English occupation:
The poor squatted where they could,
receiving starvation wages, and paying exorbitant rents for their cabins,
partly with their own labor. Unable to
rise, the wretched people multiplied on their potato plots with perfect
recklessness. During the famine which
began in the winter of 1739 one-fifth of the population is supposed to have
perished; yet it is hardly noticed in literature, and seems not to have touched
the conscience of that English public which in 1755 subscribed 100,000 pounds
for the sufferers by the Lisbon earthquake.
As might be expected where men were allowed to smuggle and forbidden to
work, redress was sought in illegal combinations and secret societies.
the 1840s a million Irish starved and a million more were driven into exile,
basically because of the oppression
of the English aristocracy. They didn't starve because of the potato
blight but because they had no money to buy any of the other food
raised in Ireland, which the landlords continued to export. [ The
Great Hunger by Cecil Woodham-Smith tells the story. ] What the English did in Ireland, they did
again in America. And it was often the
same English Lords who did it. The American Founding Freemasons, circa 1776,
did not remove that injustice. Rather,
they compounded the felony.
taking of the American continent away from its original inhabitants by force
and fraud--by armed robbery and indiscriminate slaughter--is that crime to which America was committed--which it is its crime to maintain
and its ruin to abandon. Slavery was
the second major crime to which the original colonists and founding fathers
committed us. It began in 1620 and
persisted well into the 20th century, long after the end of legal slavery. The present crime to which American society is stubbornly committed and upon which its waning prosperity is founded is the
crime of abortion. The
continuing pursuit of the American Dream
of wealth depends upon putting our children in the trash, just as we once put
the lives of native Americans and African slaves in the trash.
the original American economy a just
economy ? The large estates of George
Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and James Madison came to their
fathers and grandfathers as gifts from the corrupt legislature of
Virginia. It was land from which the
Indians had been driven by military force.
It was worked by slaves. A fellow
from the Ayn Rand Institute quotes Thomas Jefferson re: keeping the fruit of your own labor. He neglects to explain how that squares with
Jefferson appropriating the labor of 200 slaves as his own income. They worked that 10,000 acre plantation that
his father Peter Jefferson had received as his share of an 800,000 acre grant
to the Loyal Company described as a
present that the leaders of the legislature, with the governor participating,
made to themselves. It wasn't
different in New England where the Puritans systematically wiped out the
natives in the process of taking their land.
See the Governor Bradford
essay. What was it but armed robbery
those are only the most conspicuous of the gross injustices which have been an
integral part of the American economy.
For every rags to riches story of the immigrants there were 100 others
who found no good fortune in America.
Who were welcomed as cheap labor and then used up and discarded. Some 1300 Chinese laborers were killed in
accidents when the railroad was blasted through the Sierras. Some 2000 laborers, mostly Irish, died building
the right of way across southern Pennsylvania which later became the
thousands of Irishmen, fleeing the famine in Ireland, were conscripted into the
Union and Confederate armies and are numbered among the 740,000 killed in that
war. Many more wound up crippled for
life. Meanwhile, Morgan and Carnegie
bought their way out of the draft and made fortunes from the Civil War. Carnegie paid
$ 850 to get an Irish immigrant to take his place in the war. The prosperity of the capitalists was tied to corrupt government and to war. The uniforms worn by the soldiers came apart
on the battle field because they were made of shoddy--rags mashed into a pulp and reprocessed.
the great give away
the Civil War, the Congress gave vast tracts of land to the railroad companies
which gave stock to the Congressmen who passed the bills. The army rounded up the Indians to clear the
right of way. One fifth of the territory of the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Kansas,
North Dakota and Montana and vast stretches of land in Washington, Minnesota,
Nebraska, California and Louisiana were given to railroad promoters and
financiers. [ Capital City 100 ] These
railroad corporations did in effect share
the wealth with the immigrants who homesteaded on cheap land bought from
the railroads, which were given alternate sections
( 640 acres ) all the way across the
fictional railroad tycoon of Atlas
Shrugged, supposedly built his railroad across the continent without
government help . . . all by himself he
exterminated the Plains indians and then he negotiated a right of way with the
prairie dogs, whose language he spoke fluently.
tracts of western land were given to timber companies. By the time Teddy Roosevelt became President,
less than a fourth of the original 800 million acres of American virgin forest
remained. Four-fifths of the timber was
in private hands, and ten per cent of this was owned by the Southern Pacific,
the Northern Pacific, and the Weyerhaeuser Timber Company. It is silly to talk about corporations being
adversarial to government. They have
always been partners--co-conspirators.
capitalism versus competition
capitalism is supposed to be based
upon competition but the big 19th
century capitalists like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan
were the enemies of competition. They believed in competition like the mafia believes in competition. Instead they
used the power of capital to
establish monopolies--cartels and trusts
controlled by bankers and corporate lawyers.
Street converted an economic system theoretically committed to laissez-faire to
a market dominated by corporate conglomerates.
Absorbing competitors and swallowing up suppliers of raw materials, as
well as producers and distributors, these giant monopolies supplanted the
competitive market to control production, set prices, and cast industrial
policy." ( Capital City xvii
) "Morgan . . . and the other
financial barons . . . transformed
American industry from modest privately held firms into publicly owned
corporate monopolies " ( CC 272 )
the modern agribusiness corporations,
they used the power of their capital to achieve vertical integration--establish a network of suppliers and
distributors. When the elephant is free to roam, your fences and your crops
are at risk. Similarly, the freedom of the great corporation
severely restricts the economic freedom of others. You are free to work for the Coal Company or
join the army. It is corporate imperialism as described in Every Man a Speculator by Steve Fraser p 125
D. Rockefeller admired the Emperor Napoleon and did his best to imitate him
when he set up Standard Oil in Cleveland.
He did in fact establish an Empire of Oil. His multinational oil conglomerate became the
pattern for the giant cartels which still dominate the world economy. Which have no connection to free enterprise by any sensible
definition of that term. He started off
by bringing together five refineries to
unite our skill and capital . . . in place of the small business that each
separately had heretofore carried on.
( CC 41 )
1932 Herbert Hoover identified capitalism
with Rugged Individualism but
Rockefeller had no time for such silliness.
He said the day of the combination
is here to stay. Individualism has gone,
never to return. ( CC 234 ) He believed in collectivized capitalism,
multi corporation capitalism.
"When the 1873 depression sent oil values into a tailspin, he
pressed forward, annexing desperate competitors. Through methods benign, callous, and even
criminal, he wove his refining empire. We wanted the old struggle to cease. . . .
We wanted these men to pull together . . . to join us, . . . and thus work
together. Rockefeller and Standard
Oil were known for ruthless annexations
. . . how to fix a price so that it stays fixed . . . consolidating control
over prices and markets."
Oil controlled four dozen American companies plus an English subsidiary. It was a corporation
of corporations. It had joint
ventures in Germany, Holland, Italy, and Denmark. It had a huge export business to Latin
America and the Far East. It owned 4000 miles of pipe lines, a railroad
tank car fleet, and a small navy of transoceanic tankers. By 1881 the Standard Oil cartel had 40
affiliates and controlled almost 90 per cent of the nation's oil-refining capacity.
" ( CC 228 ) A similar
consolidation of the railroads was carried out by J.P. Morgan who went on to
buy out Andrew Carnegie and establish U.S. Steel. The doctrine proclaimed by corporate lawyer
and presidential candidate Samuel J
Tilden was that labor unions violate free enterprise but corporate combinations
were somehow natural. Supposedly, legislation for farmer or labor
interests was class legislation while
legislation for manufacturing, banking, railroad, and shipping interests served
the national interest. Bailing out the
big banks is good for all of us, isn't it ?
I am still waiting for the trickle
Teddy Roosevelt made a belated and half-hearted and not very successful effort
to break up these trusts. Which
eventually included a sugar trust and a cigarette trust as well as cartels or
trusts in most major commodities. J.P.
Morgan used the power of capital to morganize
the railroads. Then bought out Carnegie
Steel and established U.S. Steel with corporate lawyer Elbert H. Gary at the
head of it. ( After whom Gary Indiana is named. ) Domination by bankers and corporate lawyers
has been characteristic of American capitalism ever since. First to last they relied upon the law--upon
their ability to manipulate the law.
Morgan was a regular visitor in Washington and rewarded those who
co-operated with him. Just like they do
now. The government relied upon him to
sell its bonds in England and France.
Morgan even bankrolled the U.S. Army in one episode. He would have winked at the rhetoric about
business being independent of the government.
The real question, the one raised by Adam Smith, is whether government
can ever be independent of business--the Merchants
and Manufacturers and bankers and corporate lawyers etc. The answer is no. It isn't going to
happen. They have too much money. And Congressmen are always in need of
was a time when the king had to raise taxes to launch a war and / or to pay for
an unsuccessful war. That is what forced
Louis XVI to summon the estates general. But then they refused to dis-assemble and the
king lost his head in the ensuing revolution.
Other governments learned from that and it led to the establishment of
national banks which could loan the government the money it needed to carry on
the war. Instead of having to pay
heavier taxes to finance the war, the wealthy could make money on the money
they had in the bank, and the king could put up the whole country for
collateral. There has always been an
intimate tie between the Government and the Bank. The early resistance in America to the
establishment of a National Bank now seems quaint.
is a remarkable book by Augustus Myers [ aka Gustavus Myers ] which documents How the Great American Fortunes Were Made
[ aka History of the Great American Fortunes. ] No
doubt it took nerve and skill to survive in the New York City financial jungle,
but the only bears they fought were bear markets on Wall Street. It was a cut throat competition. Seven of 100 traders survived and the rest
went under. cf. Survival of the Fittest.
Which tended to be survival of the meanest. As witness how Carnegie dealt with his ex
partners. People admire power.
They worship it. The crimes of
Alexander and Caesar and Napoleon are brushed aside by their votaries. So it is not surprising that the titans of
industry enjoy the same adulation.
Public Works, Private Profit
complained of paying his steel workers $ 2 a day and tried to reduce it to 60c
a day. Contra the supposition that these
capitalists operated independently of the government, the steel industry was
built by public works contracts which produced private profit. Steel for the railroads, steel for the
Brooklyn Bridge. Steel for war. Carnegie was some sort of pacifist who opposed the Spanish-American
war. So, to satisfy his conscience, he
charged the government a 200 percent profit on the steel he supplied for that
Steel and its stock holders made a very large fortune out of World War I,
producing battle ships and barbed wire and benzol,
a by product of coke manufacture, which is made into explosives and poison gas.
The anti trust suit against U.S. Steel was dropped after the U.S. got
into the war in April 1917.
steel industry was built by American wars and declined after the big wars came
to an end. It pined away without the big
government contracts. The extreme wages
of the steel workers after World War II came from the extreme profits of a
steel industry which depended upon government and which depended upon war. The Roosevelt Administration in effect
dictated the recognition of the Steelworkers Union by the Steel companies who
were compensated with government military contracts from which they made large
profits in return for their patriotism. The down side was the inevitable
disappearance of the American steel industry once American wars became smaller
and less frequent. When they had to
compete with foreign made steel they couldn't do it.
Gould testified before Congress in 1883 that A corporation is only another name for the means which we have
discovered of allowing a poor man to invest his income in a great enterprise. At that time he was bringing in Chinese
laborers who brought wages down from $ 52 to $ 27 a month. Meanwhile Union Pacific stock had risen to $
78 a share. How long would it take this
Chinese coolie to save enough to buy a share of UP stock ? cf. if I didn't eat, I'd have money to burn ! He'd get one of those track side graves
wealth without work
the American Dream proclaimed by Jay
Gould and others--we can all get rich
without work by investing !--has become the prevailing false faith of all
the people. Just before the 1929 crash,
every shoeshine boy and waitress was buying stocks. The runaway speculation of the American
housing market which led to the 2009 crash was driven by a similar fever. Everybody and his brother flipping real estate while the price of
a house doubled and tripled for those that actually needed a house to live
in. Who were allowed to sign mortgages
they could not afford to facilitate the production of bundled mortgage securities sold to European banks.
Gould didn't invent leverage but he
gave a conspicuous example of it when he was manipulating the gold market. If you have $ 10,000 in the bank, how much
can you invest in this or that ? If you
are Jay Gould or some other financial industry sharpie you can invest as much
as 30 times $ 10,000 while using it for collateral. He had $ 300,000 deposited in the Tenth
National Bank in which he had a controlling interest. But got the bank to issue him $ 8 million in
certified checks which he used to buy gold.
He would drive up the price, then dump his gold to make a profit and
drive the price down again. Then buy
back in at the lower price. His one fear
was that President Grant would allow the Treasury to release some of the gold
reserves and take the air out of the inflated gold market. To head that off, he set up a gold investment
for the President's brother in law and made expensive gifts to the Grants. [
see Every Man a Speculator by Steve
Fraser pp 115-116 ]
making money off money
the banker J.P. Morgan put together U.S. Steel, he bought the Mesabi iron ore
range from John D. Rockefeller. How does
one man get hold of a 120 mile mountain range ?
File a mining and homestead claim ?
He did though. Needless to say,
neither Morgan nor Rockefeller nor Carnegie did any of the prospecting for iron
ore in northern Minnesota, especially in mid winter. The rugged characters who did were paid
something for their claims. A fraction
of what the arm chair investors of
Paris and London made from buying stock in U.S. Steel. They did no prospecting either. That defines capitalism properly so called:
making money off money. Your money works for you, it is said. That formula camouflages the fact that you
are making money from someone else's labor.
Which is how Jesus defines usury: reaping
where you did not sow.
essential characteristic of capitalism
money off money. A more accurate synonym for it is moneyism. So called
free enterprise has nothing to
do with it. There is nothing free about it. First to last, it relies upon government
favors. It relies upon the power of the
law--upon coercion. It has no connection
with enterprise, if by enterprise we mean work. The reality of what
you are doing is camouflaged by the legal fiction that your money works for you so you don't have to
in life, Carnegie became a great philanthropist. Morgan, Carnegie, and Rockefeller ushered in
an era of philanthropy on a monumental scale.
But most of the capitalists took their money with them if they
could. Vanderbilt gave the city of New
York a nice bronze frieze commemorating the achievements of Cornelius
Vanderbilt. And charity is no substitute
for justice. Is it admirable to endow a
museum with the profits made by keeping families poor ? When the kids grow up--if they do--they can
visit the museum. The establishment of
libraries by Andrew Carnegie was laudable, regardless of how he got all that
surplus money. Our modern billionaire
philanthropists endow Planned Parenthood because they are enthusiastic about
its dedication to getting rid of lower class humanity by contraception and
abortion. They believe in raising
buffalo in spacious surroundings rather than encouraging the proliferation of
lower class people on those garbage dumps that are already over crowded. Where else can they live ? There is no room for them on the buffalo
doubt Capital benefits some. So does
war. Fortunes are made, millions find
jobs. World War II ended the Great
Depression. The side effect of World War
II was 60 million killed. But World War
II and its aftermath boomed the American economy for a generation. Which illustrates the fact that the
foundation of the American economy is militarism. Which is the most ancient form of socialism,
if by that we mean the government owning and controlling everything. The Federal Government spent 5 times as much
money on World War II as it spent on the socialist
handing out of the 2.25 billion acres of the U.S. main land by the national
government which was established in 1787 is what made America the Land of
Opportunity. That land was acquired by
the army--who else ? But now that the land
has all been taken, where can we look for opportunity ? America has become the land of steadily
shrinking opportunity. Of lost jobs and
creating welfare dependents
Christian Society has to be built upon a just
economy. A master who is kind to his
slaves is still guilty of the injustice of keeping them as slaves. Government welfare programs do not cancel the
injustice of people being denied the opportunity to make a living. Giving the Indians a reservation and a ration
of cattle does not atone for depriving them of the range where they lived and
hunted the buffalo. They were
deliberately made to be dependent upon the government by systematically
destroying their way of life and forcing them onto reservations. The extermination of 75 million buffalo from
the Great Plains was a deliberate policy of the U.S. Government and the Army to
force the Plains Indians onto reservations.
It opened the way for the railroads and the white settlers. It came at the expense of the original inhabitants. Who have remained government dependents ever
have a large population of welfare dependent American Negroes because of the
long history of slavery and racial segregation which made them dependent. They make up a disproportionate share of the
slum population and the prison population for the same reasons. Virginia passed laws making it a crime to
educate slaves. Under Jim Crow laws they were denied the
opportunities which made America the Land
of Opportunity for others. Several
centuries of slavery and racial discrimination have created the situation we
have. Which is not going to disappear
any time soon.
course they are dependent upon the federal government. cf. In the black part of town, the federal
government is God. Many of them
would not have survived without the welfare measures of the New Deal. The federal government was the first to
extend job opportunities to American Negroes.
When World War II began, FDR
decreed that they should be hired in war plants even while racial segregation
continued. President Truman finally
desegregated the army during the Korean War.
The military has provided opportunities they could not find elsewhere.
military creates dependency. It is silly
to pretend that you oppose big government while you support a big
military. As if there was no connection
between the two. A basic fact about the
American economy is that The Great Depression was only ended by American entry
into World War II. Those who didn't join
the military went to work in war factories.
After the war, Veterans' programs like housing and college loans readily
morphed into similar programs for non veterans.
Now the army has taken the place of the old welfare system. Single
moms sign up for the army to get health care for their kids.
it isn't just big government that robs people of the chance to be
independent. Big corporations do the
same thing. The Company Town is just as
incompatible with individual free enterprise and personal freedom as the
army. St. Peter, don't you call me, cause I can't go, I owe my soul to the
capitalism versus free enterprise
is often the nemesis of free enterprise.
Agribusiness gobbles up small farms much like empires gobble up little
countries. Archer, Daniels and Midland own the farms and their stockholders
live in Manhattan and other places where they never get mud on their boots or
hear a rooster crow. The power of
Capital concentrated in Investment Funds is a financial tidal wave that carries
away anything and anyone in its path.
These investment funds and mutual funds and hedge funds collect the
capital from all over--sovereign wealth
funds from China and Russia and the oil sheikdoms of the Middle East; public
school teachers retirement funds; college endowments. Not to mention the funds from drug cartels
and corrupt African ruling parties which get laundered that way. All of
them are committed to making money off their money any way the hedge fund
managers can do it.
Capital devours individually owned businesses.
How many free enterprises have
been put out of business by Wal Mart ?
Independent hardware stores cannot match the prices of Lowes and Home
Depot. Individually owned restaurants
are displaced by restaurant chains created by investor capital. These stock holders never wash a dish. They don't work for a living, they own
for a living. Giant grocery store chains
put little grocery stores out of business.
Now the profit goes to the
investors, the owners of stock, not to the people who work there.
I was growing up, there was a variety of small stores in the neighborhood. Individually owned stores which reflected the
character of the proprietor. Now I have
a choice of that 7-11 store or the other 7-11 store or the new 7-11 store. There used to be a variety of coffee
shops. Now there are endless Starbucks. In the Curtis Park area of old Denver there
are blocks where every old house is different, each one designed and built by
the original owner. In the later developments
all the houses are built on two or three plans by big developers who make deals
with local governments.
army takes a million individual men and then does everything it can to erase
individuality. They emerge from the
induction process with the same haircut and the same uniform and marching in
lockstep. And that is what the power of
collectivized capital does to individual enterprise. That is how we become dependent upon the
corporations or dependent upon the government.
Those are the two choices:
capitalism or socialism. How can
we escape from that dependence ? By
rhetorical declarations on behalf of free
enterprise ? You have to fight for freedom. More often, you have to work hard to achieve
it. And lose the illusions in which
phony Christians are trapped. If you have given up on finding your place in
the government bureaucracy or the corporate bureaucracy, that is the
investing versus speculating
so called investing is speculating--gambling and rigged
gambling. A lot of it is short-selling--betting against
something. It has nothing in common with
investing if that means putting money
into productive enterprises. Warren
Buffett made a lot of money betting on the Brazilian currency. George Soros made a lot of money betting against the Thai currency and the
British pound. And did what he could to
manipulate the market. That is what
commodity and oil traders do--drive the price up and then cash in. Like Jay Gould manipulating the gold
market. Most of the international banks
got sucked into buying bundled mortgage
securities and credit default swaps--financial instruments tied to the
American housing market. Then the whole
house of cards collapsed circa 2008. The
banks lost money, but, before that happened, they did serious damage to the
American housing market, and especially to people who need homes, by greatly
inflating the price of houses. You can
live without gold but you can't live without a home. The inflated and manipulated price of oil
takes gas money from all of us to enrich the speculators.
similar thing happened a few years earlier with internet stocks which boomed and then busted in a wave of
speculation. Before that, it was the
Savings and Loan industry that went belly up.
George Bailey's Savings and
Loan in Bedford Falls invested money
in homes and businesses. But the Savings
and Loan companies which went bankrupt in the 1980s were recklessly speculating
far from home. Then the taxpayers had to
bail them out.
Day Trading has now been replaced by High Speed Trading: computers programmed to buy and sell in less
than a second to capture a profit. This
is investing ? Investing, properly so called, is when you
put your money and your work into a farm or a business. Or give someone else a loan at a moderate
rate of interest to do it. What has
replaced it in the modern financial market isn't even honest gambling. It is rigged gambling. Betting against a horse and then bribing the
jockey to dope the horse.
Faith in Capitalism
is now called Capitalism is often
more destructive than constructive--a form of legalized looting. Instead of putting money into businesses,
they squeeze it out of them. Run up
debts and then declare bankruptcy. Take
the profit out and leave the debts
and liabilities behind. They take the
stock holders snipe hunting and leave
them holding an empty bag. Venture Capitalism has been largely
displaced by Vulture Capitalism and Vampire Capitalism.
many Americans, their faith in the American empire is joined to a faith in
something called Capitalism. Which supposedly means free enterprise system and free
market economy etc. Capitalism is the answer to all our
economic woes. Or it would be if it had
not ceased to exist after Franklin Roosevelt launched the New Deal. But maybe letting the rich keep their tax break
will revive it again. On October 16th
2012, in the second debate, President Barack Obama said: the
free enterprise system is the greatest engine of prosperity that the world has
ever known. See ! And you thought he was a socialist !
or something like it has now appeared in China and Russia after they halfway
abandoned Communism. One of the
questions raised by this is how you can have free enterprise in a place which has very little freedom of any kind. Can you use the word free in the same sentence with China
or Russia or Saudi Arabia ? But it seems
like Capitalism is quite compatible
with repressive government. The late
Milton Friedman, the modern apostle of free
enterprise, took a team to Chile where he persuaded the dictator Auguste
Pinochet to substitute free enterprise
and / or Capitalism for the broken
down Socialist economy of the
government he overthrew. And they all
lived happily ever after. Or at least
the economy improved. So somehow free enterprise can flourish even when
it is decreed by a dictator. Even though
Pinochet continued to torture prisoners in the back room ( cf. Operation Condor ) like they do in China, there was a measure of
economic freedom. They made money. Which is of course the main thing.
Andrew Carnegie and Herbert Spencer
Carnegie became a convert to an updated
version of the Capitalist Faith promoted by the English philosopher
Herbert Spencer. Spencer had published a
theory of Evolution before Darwin did
but then he amalgamated Darwin's scientific
findings into his own theory to arrive at a doctrine of Survival of the Fittest in
the human economy which is now called Social
Carnegie's first encounter with Spencer left him overwhelmed: Light
came as in a flood and all was clear.
Spencer was grandly received upon his visit to New York in the 1873 panic year . . . Businessmen, who had
paid little attention to formal philosophy before, lionized the English social
theorist, devouring his books, which popularized the notion of survival of the fittest. What some have labeled his magnificent exegesis transformed
Darwin's biological hypothesis into a social imperative, declaring that in
social (and especially economic) life as in biology, survival was a competition
in which the strong succeeded (opened corporations and grew rich), and natural
(social) processes eliminated the unfit (the hapless poor). In the same unmediated way that natural
selection drove the evolution of the species, free competition balanced the
economy, maximized its productivity, and propelled economic progress. It was as perilous and futile to tamper with
the workings of the market as it was to try to turn back biological
evolution. Endowing cupidity with high
moral purpose, Spencer's social Darwinism
provided Carnegie and much of Wall Street with a rationale for laissez-faire
and unbounded profit lust." ( Capital City 172)
The Laissez-faire theory was developed in
the 19th century by John Stuart Mill and David Ricardo, a stock broker whose
writings became popular when he reversed Adam Smith's doctrine contra the Merchants and Manufacturers. His positive attitude towards businessmen was
usually included in later writings.
Herbert Spencer's extreme and unrealistic anti government doctrine is still a basic part of Capitalist ideology, part of the fiction
about corporations making it on their own.
They make it on their own with the help of the Congressmen they bribe
and the public lands they are given.
Aside from their land grants, oil leases, subsidies and bail outs, they
wish to be free from any government regulation.
Smith, Spencer was unable to recognize that the foundation of the British
Empire was militarism--the success of
the army and the navy. All of the land
of England became the property of King William after the Normans defeated the
Saxons in 1066. The king claimed the
lands of England as his own by right of conquest and leased it to his barons
and knights in return for military service.
William divided the land into 60,000 military allotments to be held
under tenure of knight's service of
40 days a year. Later, taxes replaced
the obligation of military service.
William was the legal owner of
the deer in the forest and the fish in the sea.
If you wanted to catch fish, you needed a license from the King. The basic structure of the economy of England
copied the structure of the army. It is
properly called militarism. If you want to escape from socialism you first have to escape from militarism, because it is basically the
same thing: the government owns
everything and controls everyone. The
basic reason the Communists found it
easy to establish a totalitarian state was that Czarist Russia was already a
totally militarized state and also a failed state whose corrupt and inept
military structure had all but collapsed by the end of World War I. See Alan Moorehead The Russian Revolution and Edward Crankshaw The Shadow of the Winter Palace.
They didn't even know how many Russian peasant soldiers had been
killed--was it 5 million or 8 million ?
British Empire at its zenith in the 18th and 19th century, an empire upon which
the sun never set, provided enormous
opportunities for the better off class of England, so long as the British army
and the British navy were successful-- Rule Britannia, Britannia rule the waves ! Just furnishing the fleet was good
business. And it wasn't different in
America where the new U.S. government circa 1787 replaced the colonial
legislatures in giving away the continent after the army secured it. [ see Christian
Economy versus Capitalism and versus Socialism aka Adam Smith in the Dock ]
18th and 19th century philosophers promulgated the untenable dogmas which still
circulate such as the primitive social
contract and the sovereignty of the
people. Did you sign a social contract ? For some reason I was not invited to the
meeting. In the economic sphere they
promulgated the doctrines of the natural rights of buying and selling, and the
sufficiency of enlightened selfishness.
In theory, they consecrated the spirit of individualism, and the state
of non-government. In practice, they
justified that unlimited property right
which the giant corporations exemplify just like the Dukes of Adam Smith's
Adam Smith, Herbert Spencer was a camouflaged anti Christian who believed in monism
or Pantheism--the Harmonious Natural Universe of the Stoics. That is the basis of the false faith in the Natural economy of human society. An economy which does not require any moral
principles so long as it is left natural
question as to whether the economy needs morality
is different from the question as to whether it needs legality--whether we should rely upon the government to establish a
just economy by its endless laws. It is
similar to the question as to whether we can look to the government to out law
abortion versus trying to establish social morality independently of the police
power. Which once neglected to enforce
the laws against abortion and which now protects abortion. Government is good at pretending to do
things. And people are easily fooled by
that pretence because they wish to be fooled.
It gives them their excuse for ducking the fight via vote and pray.
Ayn Rand and Atlas
peculiar modern variant of the faith in Capitalism
has been promoted by Atlas Shrugged,
a 1957 novel by Ayn Rand that romanticizes and idealizes Capitalism. The novel
presents a handful of Capitalist heroes who go on strike--who abandon their
essential role in creating a prosperous economy after they become disgusted
with the Welfare State voted in by the dependent masses. So they move to a Capitalist Shangri La hidden away in a valley of
the Rocky Mountains, leaving those foolish masses to perish. It is an end
times scenario which offers no hope to all the moist-mouthed weaklings who vote themselves benefits at the expense
of the heroic few who create the wealth.
There is also one heroine modeled on Ayn Rand herself. She was an atheist as well as a believer in
Capitalism. She also believed in free
love, abortion and cigarettes.
was a childless woman, either because she did not want children, or because she
was not able to have a child. She may
have been sterile because of abortions.
Which were common in post revolution Leningrad, where she was a student,
and in the Hollywood of the 1920s where she was a screenwriter. That would explain the peculiar and extreme
pro selfishness dogma in her novel
contra refusing to sacrifice yourself
or your career for dependent moist-mouthed
weaklings--a phrase that keeps recurring in the novel.
began making notes for Atlas Shrugged
a month before her 40th birthday. And
went into a prolonged post partum
depression after finishing it. Judging
from the novel and her later behavior, she was mad at the world. Post abortion stress disorder would help
explain the hostility to humanity which drives the plot and creates an ideology
in which everyone is despicable except for a handful of heroes. The novel is nominally pro business but
nearly all of the businessmen in it are as despicable as everyone else. Like the radical feminists, she defined
female freedom as an absolute and unlimited right which
requires abortion. Put your baby in the
trash and be free ! Cf. freedom's
just another word for nothin left to lose.
She also acquired a severe case of lung cancer from smoking. The title of Milton Friedman's Free to Choose video plays off the Freedom of Choice slogan used to justify
the heroic farmer
reality, the economy depends far more upon the chicken and egg farmers, the
dairy farmers, the butchers and bakers etc. than it does upon these government
subsidized builders of railroads and steel mills. Upon which the industrial might of America
depends--its capacity to wage war on the other side of the world. Without it, the Military Power of the Empire
may Crumble, but, so long as the chicken farmer still shows up in the morning,
we can still eat.
reason Ayn Rand and her novel have to be noticed is that she has influenced
many of those who have promoted the faith in Capitalism in the last 50
years. Alan Greenspan, the former long
time chairman of the Federal Reserve, is a disciple of Ayn Rand. Milton Friedman was a fan. And Ronald Reagan, George Bush junior, Rush
Limbaugh and Mike Rosen et al, have been greatly influenced by her and / or by
Milton Friedman. Her attempt to promote
a Very Peculiar Faith in Capitalism has had a substantial success. Paul Ryan, the Republican candidate for vice
president, admits that Ayn Rand's novel was a major influence on his economic
convictions. Meanwhile, neither he nor
Joe Biden had anything to say about Catholic
Social Teaching in their debate on how to fix the economy.
Rand presents a comic book fantasy about the creative power of a few Atlas type Capitalist heroes who are the
source of all wealth. The basic doctrine
of both Adam Smith and Karl Marx is that labour
is the source of all wealth. But the bounty of Nature--aka God's Providence--is the major source of what we
need. Of course, it takes some work, or some hunting at least, to gather
what nature gives. But, in human
society, wealth is primarily
distributed as loot following successful militarism
or successful forays by those who have capital--surplus
money. It flows to those who belong to
the governing party. The natural wealth
of North America was claimed by those who had the most muskets.
Greenspan visited Kirkcaldy Scotland, Adam Smith's birth place, on February 6th
2005 and spoke there in praise of Smith's
demonstration of the inherent
stability and growth of what we now term free-market capitalism. . . . One
could hardly imagine that today's awesome array of international transactions
would produce the relative economic stability that we experience daily if they
were not led by some international version of Smith's invisible hand. It was three years later that the
international economy fell into the excavation in which we now find
ourselves. It may be relatively stable at the level of the
bankers who have easy access to the Federal Reserve but half the young people
of Italy and Spain can find no jobs and it is almost as bad here. Thousands of people are being evicted from
their homes here and there. The whole of
Africa languishes in poverty and misery because of the gross corruption of the
governing class which is facilitated by the international financial system. It is the same story in most of Asia and
South America. A large part of the
population of the Philippines, America's former colony, depend upon the garbage
dump for their livelihood.
successor at the Federal Reserve is desperately trying to do
something--anything--to revive the economy.
Mr. Bernanke's latest move is to pledge that the Reserve will buy
another $ 40 billion worth of mortgage
backed securities every month indefinitely until the employment rate goes
down. So now they are buying 85 billion
a month. Thank god it is still short of
100 billion a month. That would be a lot
of money ! Give the banks even more
money to pile on top of the money they already have. And, hopefully, they will do something with
it. Loan it to those who will launch free enterprises which will hire
American workers. Unless they buy
machines instead, lay off workers, and start up factories some where in
Asia. Where is he getting this money ? In effect, the Federal Reserve has issued
itself a no limit credit card. They
didn't even go to the trouble to print the money. Well, it would use up a lot of expensive
paper. Plastic is much cheaper and just
as good. Isn't plastic as good as gold
? That seems to be the modern
Smith's original faith in a System of
Natural Liberty in respect to the economy had a backstairs connection to a
faith in a System of Natural Liberty
in respect to sexuality. Most of the
18th century intellectuals were closet anti Christians who had to outwardly
conform to the Christian establishment before it was undermined and overthrown
by the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Many of them were disguised atheists or
Deists or pantheists. And their
hostility to the Christian Church was often rooted in sexual rebellion. The English public school system which took
boys away from their mothers and sisters and put them in all male boarding
schools at a very young age was almost scientifically designed to produce
sexual and emotional stunting and to promote homosexuality.
lot of people pick up on atheism
because it provides an intellectually respectable position which is much easier
to discuss than their reasons for being unable or unwilling to conform to the
strict standard of sexual morality [ and monogamous performance ] which has
always been part of the Christian religion.
That tends to be a much more embarrassing subject.
sexual rebellion component of natural
and free came out in the open during the French
Revolution. The faith in free love was part of the secret
ideology of the 18th century Freemasons.
And it turns up again in the Communist movement of the 19th century and
in the Socialist movement--aside from the Christian socialists--and in the feminist
movement. It relies upon arguments which
are basically similar to those used on behalf of a free economy: we don't need
regulators or chaperones; you can Trust Nature. The insistence upon free love as an absolute right which includes the right to abortion
shows up in the philosophy of Ayn Rand and in the Women's Liberation Movement
of the 1960s. Which is still around in
various guises. Ayn Rand's private
life--which has long since become public--is a good illustration of the basic
fallacy of free love--that no harm
comes from it. (see The Ayn Rand Cult Jeff
primary fallacy of the faith in Capitalism is the silly assumption that there
is a natural system in the human economy which does not require
any moral standards among the individuals who belong to that economy. All they have to do is act naturally--pursue their love of money--while nature takes care of all the rest of it. There is a further assumption that this system can be fixed when it breaks down,
as it did during the Great Depression of the 1930s--or that it will naturally fix itself. Then there is an endless argument as to how
to fix it, whether by the government pumping money into the economy or by
lowering taxes to unleash private enterprise--turn the corporations loose. Last time, it was World War II that finally
fixed the broken down economy. So is
World War III now our best hope ? Let us
hope not. And try to find a better
The Land of Shrinking Opportunities
made America the land of opportunity was the dropping of barriers to
immigrants and the Homestead Act which allowed them to come here and claim 160
acres of the American prairie. What an
extraordinary time ! Not only was a poor
immigrant free to move to America, he could claim a country estate once he got
here ! A 19th century ballad celebrated
Sam is rich enough to give us all a farm !
course it happened because the transcontinental railroads wanted settlers. But all the same it happened. Now there is a high fence to keep the
immigrants out and the farm land belongs to the corporations and the
land was given to anyone willing to try and live out there and make a go of
it. Millions of poor people came here to
pursue a bright future in a new land.
The American definition of freedom
and opportunity was forged by this
great land giveaway, this great opportunity to escape from the stratified
societies of Europe in which those born poor had little chance to avoid dying
seemed like a recipe for paradise. But
the homesteader who found himself to be the proud owner of 160 acres of North
Dakota prairie--the squatter in residence anyway--soon discovered that the
reality of being a land owner in America was substantially Different from the
1860 and 1910 the number of farms in the United States increased from 2 million
to 6 million. Many of these new farmers
were homesteaders, immigrants from Europe.
The acreage under cultivation increased from 400 million to 900 million
acres. The production of wheat rose from 173 to 635 million bushels
when farmers began to raise grain for distant markets they put themselves at
the mercy of powerful and predatory forces.
Producing for the world market made the farmer dependent upon the
railroads and the commodities traders.
Most of what he got for his grain went for freight charges. The boom times created by World War I pushed
farmers to mortgage their farms and expand production. But many of them went bankrupt when the price
of wheat fell. They lost the farm or
went from being owners to being tenants.
bubble of Civil War prosperity burst in 1868 as did that of the World War in
1920. Farm income fell by half in the
1920s and farmers were already hurting before the Great Depression hit the rest
of the country. The reason the
prosperity continued for a while after World War II is that Europe and Asia
were so devastated. While they were
recovering, American farming and manufacturing had a big market with little
competition. But times have
World War I, they had to compete with the great expansion of farming in Canada
as well as Argentina, Brazil, Australia and even Russia. And most of this farming was investor driven
instead of being the old fashioned kind of farming in which the farmer mainly
raised food for his own family or the nearby town. While most American industry was still
protected by a tariff wall, the farmer who competed in the world market had no
Disappearance of Independent Farmers
struggles of these pioneers is described by Rolvaag Giants in the Earth Mari
Sandoz Old Jules and Hamlin Garland A Son of the Middle Border. In which Garland describes the experience of
his homesteading family in the songs they sang--
When we've wood and
Won by our toil,
We'll reign like kings in fairy land
Lords of the soil
after the railroads, banks, commodities brokers and mortgage companies got hold
of them, they went from being independent farmers to being tenants, and they
There's a dear old
homestead on Nebraska's fertile plain
There I toiled my manhood's strength away:
All that labor now is lost to me, but it is Shylock's gain
For that dear old home he claims today.
1880 three fourths of the farmers owned their own farms. That dropped to two thirds by 1900. By 1930 only half were owners and the other
half were tenants. In Nebraska the
percentage of tenant farmers increased from 18 to 47 percent in the period from
1880 to 1930. It was similar to what
happened in other states. Tenant
farmers--sharecroppers--became the norm in much of the rural South. Long before the Capitalism label came into use, the system whereby the owner of the land reaps where he did not sow was common. The tenant works to earn his share. The owner earns his by owning. Adam Smith believed it to be the natural
order of things when the Dukes owned the land and leased it to the Farmers who
employed the laborers. The Duke received
most of the income while the laborer did all the work. It wasn't long before this order was established in America with
the bank or the Corporation taking the place of the Duke.
depression in American agriculture in the 1920s pushed farm people into the
cities. Where they were caught by the
depression of the 1930s. During the
Great Depression, many tried to escape from the bread lines and the high rents
in the city and go back to the farm.
Organizations like the Catholic Worker launched a back to the land movement which encouraged people to establish communities in rural areas. The National Catholic Rural Life Conference
sponsored a back-to-the-farm movement which gave people 10 acres on easy
terms. It was subsistence farming, not
market farming, but it gave people a place to live and the chance to raise a
lot of what they ate.
War II put an end to most of these experiments.
The men wound up in the military and the women wound up working in the
war factories. 10 acres appealed to
people standing in soup lines in the city.
But scratching a living out of a subsistence homestead lost its appeal
when the war time economy started booming.
They lacked the morality which would have encouraged them to refuse
military service and to reject the pursuit of the high wages offered by the
tank factories. They lacked the
theological perspective whereby they might have remained faithful to a
Christian community. The Whole State
theology of the Worldly Church teaches us to accept the nation as the central
focus of society. And there is no
understanding that Christians have to avoid the temptations of boom times and
the appetite for luxurious living.
Hebrews who escaped from slavery in Egypt were not all that happy with their
new freedom in the desert and especially they were not satisfied with manna
from heaven. They sighed for the flesh pots of Egypt.
It is hard for people to accept a simple life unless they have been
taught to believe in it. They can't be
content with a home and a livelihood which would be the envy of much of the
world. A dream of wealth pushed them to
gamble away what they had. The kids want
to go to town and buy candy. Ma wants to
go shopping. The old man wants to visit the tavern.
Three generations from shirt sleeves to
shirt sleeves describes
the pattern whereby grandpa's success encouraged his son to buy a new Ford and
a house in town while raising grain for a market boomed by the war. When boom led to bust, the grandson wound up
back on the farm with a mortgage to pay off.
There is something similar in the way that so many homes have been lost
because people used them to raise money via equity
loans and then got stuck with mortgage payments they could not afford. Instead of putting the priority upon securing
a home, and recognizing that the runaway inflation was being driven by
speculators, they used its inflated value to cash in. Then they got cashed in.
can never be content with enough unless they have a solid spiritual foundation
which insulates them from these restless material aspirations. Leaving the spiritual life unexplored and
neglected pushes us into that endless trip into the wonderful world of material
have to resist the urge to keep up with
the Joneses and the mandate to stay
abreast of the latest technology.
Technology is a wonderful servant but a terrible master. Do you control it ? Or does it control you ? Does it make our work easier ? Or put us out of work ? For millions of people, new technology
controlled by the corporations for the benefit of the stockholders has meant
the end of their employment. The process
was controlled by the people with the money, not the people who were doing the
is something to be said for efficiency
which makes things cheaper. But, more
often than not, the main effect is to make the rich even richer.
25 families . . . one family
story in the paper describes how one family farms 8900 acres which used to be
home to 25 families. The population of
the nearby town is half what it was 40 years ago. Is this more efficient ? Of course it is
more efficient in producing those grain surpluses which governments have to
keep off the market to keep the price up.
But it is 1/25th as efficient at providing a place to live and a
livelihood for families. Who now must
live in the city and compete for jobs with the government or jobs with the downsizing corporations.
major cause and symptom of the collapse of the old Roman Empire was the ruin of
agriculture and the forcing of country people into the large cities where they
became dependent upon government welfare--upon bread and circuses. The concentration of a pauper population in the
towns, was accompanied by the denudation and desolation of the country
farmer began by using machinery which displaced the farm laborer. He ended by being displaced himself. The horse was replaced by the tractor. The tractor has been replaced by a giant
combine that can harvest 1000 acres in a day.
Meanwhile, the farmer and his family have been replaced by a giant
corporation. It is owned by distant
stockholders who never did a day's work on a farm. The sovereign
wealth funds of Russia and China and Saudi Arabia are invested in American
agriculture via stock in these agribusiness corporations. A major goal of the Bolshevik revolution was
to entirely displace small farmers with giant farm factories. Which is what is being done here in America
by the runaway power of money. All the
people who once lived and worked on those farms are gone, pushed out to crowd
into gigantic cities.
so long ago, horses still shared our labors and our lives on those farms and
ranches where our grandparents lived.
They were friends. Now we spend
our lives estranged from horses and living in exile from those quiet country
places which were not paradise but a lot better than these giant cities with
bad air where you line up for government welfare benefits or join the fierce
competition for a dwindling number of job opportunities.
small towns of America are deserted and dying.
The old ranch society is gone and the
community dance hall is boarded up.
Governor Bradford lamented the disappearance of the original Plymouth
community. It has happened again and for
the same basic reasons. [ See the
Governor Bradford essay ] Because we are
easily seduced by the lure of big wages in boom times, in war times, we leave
behind something that money can't buy. When
we don't really believe in a life beyond this one, we are determined to make
the best of this one. Which means lots
of money and lots of things--an endless shopping trip. Insecurity drives greed. When you have no real community and no family you can rely upon, you seek security in a pile of those
certificates to which In God We Trust
was belatedly added.
the world, corrupt economic forces relentlessly push people out of the country
and into enormous cities clogged by traffic and plagued by every kind of crime.
Much of what made the old cities good places to live has been destroyed
by the tidal wave of money belonging to speculators and profiteers. Mideast oil billionaires and Russian and
Chinese Communist Capitalists speculate in American real estate.
speculators fleeing the stock market drive up the price of farm land far beyond
what it is worth as crop producing land, just as they drove up the price of
houses far beyond what they were worth as homes where people could live. There are a dozen middle men who somehow insert themselves into the exchange between
someone selling a home and someone trying to buy one.
The suitcase farmers who cared about money
and who did not care about the land had a major role in ruining the land and
turning the great American prairie into the dust
bowl of the 1930s. Speculators and
money farmers destroyed farm land.
Absentee owners neglected the land and tenants had not the means or the
motive to take care of it. By the 1930s
a large part of American farm land had been eroded to where it could produce
little or nothing. If your farm is your
permanent home, you care about it and take care of it. But if the enterprise is driven by the need
to Make Money and Move On the land
turned a great blessing into a curse because of loving money more than they
loved the land. There was a large class
of men who had no interest in a farm home where they could raise a family. They had no spiritual center except
money. Speculators who did not know the
difference between summer and winter wheat drove up the price of farm land
while other speculators drove down the price of wheat. Even if you were a very good farmer, your
crop was devoured by that vast tribe of middle men who are a worse plague than
The Jefferson model
Jefferson had a vision of America as a nation of independent farmers. Meanwhile, his family lived on a 10,000 acre
estate worked by 200 slaves. If the
Jefferson model had prevailed and spread over the 2.25 billion acres of the
American mainland, America would now have 225,000 white families living on
estates worked by 45 million negro slaves.
The Jefferson model did not prevail but the spirit of get all you can, any way you can get it did prevail.
the great estates of the founding fathers, a lot of farming gets pushed into
raising cash crops like tobacco and
cotton for a distant market. The model
of a small farm which raised food to feed the family that lived there had to
compete with the inflated price of farm land pegged at the price of what it
could produce by way of a cash crop. Now
speculators fleeing a collapsed stock market or a devastated real estate market
push the price of farm land far beyond it's value even as a production unit of
the world market.
have to have strict principles to protect themselves from those with no
spiritual values who are animated by the love of money. Paul tells us to have no communion with such
people don't eat with extortioners.
That advice is still relevant.
But that love of money tends to get into all of us, unless we are
vigilant to keep it out.
makes sense for people to try and move back to farms and ranches and back to
small towns, despite the difficulty. A
good house in a small town in Kansas or Wyoming sells for a tenth of what that
same house would sell for in a big city.
Of course the challenge is how to make a living in such places. Farming which depends upon national and
international markets puts you in competition with Archer, Daniels and
Midland. But most of the existing
communal groups have found other things they can produce and sell to make ends
meet. The old Shakers produced quality
craftsmanship which is still cherished.
communal groups like the Amish and the Hutterites have persisted because they
did believe in keeping apart from the
world. They might be criticized for
withdrawing too much from the world,
for not challenging the evil of the world, for making an implicit deal with the
world: we'll leave you alone if you leave us alone. The Amish are more of a tourist attraction
than a serious challenge to the evil of the world around them. But they are at least a kind of museum of
Christian Community and they illustrate the possibility of escaping from the
ruined economies and the bad air of our gigantic cities into which millions
have now moved leaving the rural areas and the small towns deserted.
into a communal experiment requires that you look before you leap. But
the hazards of trying to survive in the big city are arguably as bad. There are communities which have grown up in
the inner city. People plant gardens on
the vacant lots. There is a new frontier in the abandoned inner cities.
A Nation of Immigrants
has been rightly described as a nation of immigrants. Immigrants
began arriving in America in 1607 and there was a river of immigration,
interrupted by wars and other events, until it was shut down to a trickle by
laws passed in 1921 and 1924. Between
1820 and 1930 some 38 million immigrants arrived in America, although a
substantial number of them went back to where they came from after they found
their fortunes in America or failed to find them. Contra the myth, not everyone who came to
America got rich.
of these immigrants took up free farms under the Homestead Act, but most of
them wound up in the cities working for the rapidly expanding industries of
America. The owners of industry wanted
all the cheap labor they could get and the wages of those already here were
constantly undercut by new waves of half starved immigrants willing to work for
less. That is one of the things that
drove the later restrictions on immigration.
1883 Emma Lazarus wrote a poem which celebrated the Statue of Liberty then being built in New York Harbor as
symbolizing America's open door policy to immigration:
The New Colossus by Emma Lazarus
like the brazen giant of Greek fame
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame
ancient lands, your storied pomp !" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your
tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door !"
fact, the Statue of Liberty had nothing to do with welcoming immigrants. When it was dedicated in 1886 no one said
anything about welcoming the huddled
masses yearning to breathe free. A
plaque with the Emma Lazarus poem on it was not installed in the Statue until
1903--without any ceremony. The Statue
of Liberty Enlightening the World
actually represents Isis the Egyptian Sun Goddess and it was a gift from the
Freemasons of France to the Freemasons of America to commemorate the twin
revolutions in 18th century France and America which overthrew the old social
order and introduced the new world order
which has been with us in one guise or another ever since. The liberty
represented by Isis includes especially the sexual liberty which was the half
concealed agenda of the 18th century Freemasons. Now it has become the norm in
modern America and modern France--free
love is out in the open. The bath houses are in business and the
abortion mills are rolling.
Lazarus had served on a committee which assisted Jewish refugees from Russia
who came here in large numbers after the Czar Alexander was assassinated in
1881 by left wing radicals including some from Jewish backgrounds. The Jews of Russia were indiscriminately
attacked and persecuted as a result even though most of them had nothing to do
with it. Just as we blame the Moslems in
general for acts of terrorism by radical Moslems.
Your Invitation Has Been Canceled
the time she wrote her poem, immigration to America had already been curtailed
by the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
Which was pushed primarily by organized labor. Samuel Gompers of the American Federation of
Labor had once been fired from a cigar factory along with everyone else after
Chinese workers had been brought in to take their jobs. When the Irish gold seekers participating in
the 1849 California gold rush declined the low wages and dangerous conditions
of working on the new railroad through the Sierras, the railroad owners brought
in Chinese workers who were happy to escape from the violent chaos in
restrictive laws which were passed in 1917, 1921 and 1924 were especially aimed
at immigrants from southern and eastern Europe, including the Jews of Russia,
whose arrival in America Emma Lazarus had celebrated. The case made against the Russian Jews is
that they were all anarchists and Communists and socialists. Which wasn't even half true, although there
was some truth to the caricature. In the
19th century many European Jews left Judaism behind and a substantial number of
them embraced the new socialist faith
in its various forms.
severe restrictions on immigration which America had passed in 1924 remained in
place thereafter. In 1942 Americans
refused to allow the immigration of Jews from Europe who were desperately
trying to escape from the Nazi persecution.
The golden door stayed
shut. The policy of Hitler's government
was to push the Jews into exile. It was
only after America and Britain blocked the emigration that Hitler launched the Final Solution.
then Americans have refused refuge to the Vietnamese boat people for whom
America was responsible. As well as
trying to stop the flow of refugees from Cuba and Haiti. Now the national priority is to somehow
reverse the flow of immigrants fleeing the poverty and violence of Mexico. Americans really don't have the right to
repeat the claim of world-wide welcome
which is still found on that plaque inside the Statue of Liberty. It is one of the self deceptions that belong
to our national self worship. Honesty
requires us to draw a line through it.
We took in that welcome mat a long time ago. We still welcome the well-educated and the
affluent, yearning to become more affluent, but the huddled masses can go back where they came from. They aren't going to breathe our air if we
can help it !
World War I broke out, the Statue of Liberty was used as a symbol for military
recruitment. So Liberty meant being conscripted into the army and sent off to
France in that war which was supposed to make
the world safe for democracy.
Actually it opened the way for the Bolsheviks and the Nazis to strut
their stuff on the world stage and launch another World War which killed 60
million. Meanwhile, 10,000 Americans who
had no enthusiasm for the war were arrested under the Patriot Act of 1917. That is how Freedom was defined. You are
free to go to jail if you don't go
along with the war.
the 19th century, the government, at the behest of the corporations, allowed a mass of immigrants to drive down
wages. Between 1820 and 1860 more than 5
million Europeans migrated to the United States. Three million came between 1865 and 1873 when
the economy crashed and put 3 million out of work. In New York City 5000 businesses went out of
business. By 1874 New York City had
100,000 unemployed out of a population of one million. "Thousands were evicted from their
homes, and over the winter more than 90,000 citizens were lodged at one time or
another in the city's police stations. Hundreds wander, homeless, in this great
city through the winter storm . . . in the midst of plenty they starve. ( CC
161 ) This depression lasted most of
the 1870s. Another depression came in
1893. There was a post World War I recession
which led to 4 million unemployed in 1921, nine years before the Great
Depression hit. It hit the farmers hard
and pushed them into the cities just in time for the Depression.
is a Real Question as to how many of the world's poor people can or should be
accommodated in an America which already has a very large population of poor
people for whom the American Dream has been long deferred. A major reason for the shutting down of
immigration was the growing power of American workers whose wages were undercut
by a constant influx of immigrants happy to work for anything they could
get. We have now solved that
problem--the Capitalists have solved
it--by shipping the factories to where the cheap labor can be found. The Chinese are still excluded but they get
the jobs anyway.
downsizing of America
question they ask in the election is: are you better off now than you were four
years ago ? Which is a short sighted
perspective. A better question is
whether the American economy provides as much opportunity as it did 50 years
ago. And the answer is that it does
not. America has lost 50 million family wage jobs in that time because
of corporations downsizing and outsourcing. The jobs that have replaced them are
subsistence wage jobs in fast food restaurants.
Servant wage jobs which allow a single person to get by, so long as you
make no attempt to raise a family. We
have built an anti family economy.
steady disappearance of American manufacturing has put millions of men out of
work. Men are disproportionately
unemployed in the current recession.
Women hold most of the jobs in many sectors of the economy, especially
the large government bureaucracies.
Which leads to stay at home dads at best. More often, it leads to families without
fathers and women with no children.
really is no great mystery about what has happened to American jobs. Both political parties have gone along with a
policy of global free trade which has
destroyed American jobs. The American
people have gone along with it because of their short sighted pursuit of entry
into the privileged class.
1962, when Congress and the Kennedy Administration passed the Trade Expansion
Act, Glenn Cunningham, a Republican congressman from Nebraska said: I am
convinced that we can never compete favorably with foreign countries, even when
all trade and tariff barriers are removed.
The cheap labor used in foreign plants means that their products can be
shipped here and sold at less cost than comparable American-made products. Whenever this happens, thousands and perhaps
millions of workers will be laid off and become unemployed. That is just what happened. Whether or not this gentleman was a prophet,
he nailed it. And for the obvious reason
that American workers who expect to be paid $ 5 an hour or $ 10 an hour or even
$ 20 an hour can simply not compete in the same market with those impoverished
millions all over the world who jump at the chance to work for $ 1 an hour or
Perot warned of what NAFTA would do--giant
sucking sound of American jobs going to central America--but both major
party candidates continued to support NAFTA, the North American Free Trade
Agreement, which has in fact led to thousands of jobs being moved to factories
in central America at the expense of U.S. workers. This is supposedly a free market--capital
flows freely across the border, cheap
shirts flow back, while labor
has to swim the Rio Grande or walk through the desert at night and climb a high
all those American workers displaced by downsizing,
outsourcing, and automation move up to salaried positions in the privileged class
via investing $ 100,000 in a college education ? That is the Big Illusion and the propaganda
lie that has distracted Americans from
realizing that the American Economy has been pulled out from under them while
they were distracted by the American
Dream. From which they will have a
rude awakening. GATT and NAFTA have
accelerated the policy of shipping American jobs out of America.
has there been so little resistance to this Downsizing
of America ? One reason is that more
than half of Americans are invested in the stock market either directly or
indirectly through 401ks or IRAs or pension funds etc. When General Electric laid off 272,000
workers the value of its stock soared.
While some Americans were losing their jobs, many other Americans saw
the value of their investments increase.
The Texas school teachers pension fund--$ 100 billion or so--is invested
in the stock market and they expect to get 8 percent on their money. Or at least they need that kind of a return
to meet their obligations. Same is true
of Calpers the California public
employees retirement fund. The same is
true of these other pension funds.
unions which sometimes offered a half-hearted resistance to the mass lay offs,
were preoccupied with preserving the wages and benefits of senior union
members. It was not hard to persuade
them to sell out, not just workers in general but even the junior members of
their own unions. Runaway automation
continues to replace bank tellers with ATMs and grocery store clerks with self
scanners. The labor unions carry out a
rear guard action which protects senior workers by sacrificing the new
consumers have benefited from the low prices for electronic goods imported from
Asia. And prefer the cars made in
Germany or Japan to the cars made in Detroit which were made as cheaply as
possible to compensate for the extreme wages and benefits the auto makers had
to pay to the United Auto Workers. A
similar thing happened to the American Steel Industry which priced itself out
of existence after the big American wars ended and the military contracts upon
which it depended came to an end. Should
we care about our fellow American workers ?
How much did they care about us when they pursued these rip off
basic characteristic of early Christian society is that they really did care
about one another. The basic
characteristic of American society, as of every secular society, is that
Americans do not care about other Americans--not if there is money to be made
by selling them out. When you stick a
pin in the hot air balloon of patriotic rhetoric, that is the reality which
appears. Millions of Americans continue
to pursue wealth without work while millions of other Americans sink deeper
into the poverty which results.
Americans invoke verbal blessings upon other Americans in the way that
James 2.15-16 describes, but it is only words.
basic reason there has been so little resistance to the wholesale erosion of
American jobs is that Faith in the
American Dream which is the grand illusion of so many. When you expect to become a rock star or have
a career in the NBA, or at least find a comfortable position in the privileged
class via a college education, you are not likely to become alarmed when Hanes
and Fruit of the Loom move all the underwear manufacturing jobs from places
like Mississippi to places like Vietnam.
one will admit that his American dream is a $ 12 an hour job in an underwear
factory. And it makes perfect sense to
the underwear manufacturers to move their factories to places where people are
glad to get $ 1 an hour. Their stock
holders applaud as well. And the number
of Americans who own stock outnumbers those who worked in these factories. We have now reached the point where the
entire American garment industry has been shipped overseas. So now we can all be lawyers and doctors or
other high salaried professionals, or get a job with the government. Some of us can, anyway. The other 250 million can get food stamps and
section 8 housing and shop at the Good Will.
Where there are racks full of clothes made in Asia or Central
from all the people who are willing to take our underwear manufacturing jobs
for $ 1 an hour, there are a large number of highly educated people in places
like India who are qualified for those high tech jobs and who will do them for
a third of what a college educated American expects to get.
not arguing that America can insulate its prosperity from the poverty of the
rest of the world. It is obviously too
late for that. But that means we have to
deal with the fact of the terrible poverty of the rest of the world which
relentlessly undermines our prosperity.
We have to deal with the poverty in Mexico which drives so many millions
to come here in a desperate quest for survival, while the flashing red light on
the Statue of Liberty says go
the prosperity of our free enterprise
system was going to be shared with the rest of the world. The opposite has happened. What we actually exported was a system of legalized looting which enriches the
corrupt governing classes at the expense of the rest of the people who languish
in the most wretched poverty. As in
Mexico, where all the wealth has been stolen by the revolutionary ruling party.
Subsidizing the World
prosperity has steadily eroded while American manufacturing has been shut down
and shipped abroad. A major reason for
that is the global imperial view of those at the apex of the federal
government, who have to maintain that world dominance which otherwise depends
upon 800 air bases and naval bases and army bases in 39 countries all over the
world. It is cheaper to subsidize
foreign armies than to ship one over seas.
And even cheaper to allow most
favored nation trade deals. It makes
sense, from the imperial point of view, to distribute billions of American
dollars in military subsidies to half the nations on the planet. Waning empires prefer bribery to war. It is cheaper and a lot less trouble. The Egyptian army gets a billion a year in
return for keeping the peace with Israel.
Mubarak accumulated a couple of billion while he was President. Who knows how many billions Israel has received. And all those other nations are client states
also. And everywhere there is
aid has been defined as the process by
which poor people in rich countries give money to rich people in poor countries. In 1981 Prime Minister Begin of Israel asked
angrily Are we a vassal state of yours
? Are we a banana republic ? The answer to that is yes. Between 1966 and 1991
Israel received more than $ 75 billion in American aid.
the perspective of the imperial White House, sacrificing the lives of soldiers
to maintain America's position in the world is acceptable. So neither do they balk at policies which
lead to thousands of laid off workers in America. The extension of most favored nation status to China may put a lot of Americans out
of work and cost America a lot of money, but it is arguably cheaper than
doubling the military establishment in that part of the world to meet the
threat of a hostile China.
with subsidies to the military, America is committed to allowing all these
client states to sell whatever they have to sell in the U.S. In effect the federal government subsidizes
and encourages all that so-called free
trade which tips the balance of trade away from America. Germany and Japan, Taiwan and Korea are all
in effect client states of the American Empire.
As are the nations of Latin America.
The American Government has dependents
all over the world. And can't really
take care of them all without neglecting its home populace.
and Afghanistan have absorbed billions of American dollars. And exhibit that wholesale corruption which
invariably accompanies such largesse.
Pakistan gets more billions for supposedly helping us, even while they
seem to be helping the other side with our money. Like a gal that takes your money and gives it
to another man. America was the landlord
of the Philippines for 50 years. And
left behind one of the most thoroughly corrupt nations you could find any
where. As aptly symbolized by the 20,000
pairs of shoes that Imelda Marcos left behind when she and her husband took
their billions and got out of there, headed for a luxurious exile. Meanwhile, a large part of the population
lives out at the dump.
money paid to Egypt goes to the Egyptian army which is corrupted by
it--although it was already corrupt. The
billions given to Pakistan go to the army of course. And the generals transfer the money to off shore bank accounts. The same story is repeated in other
places. Wherever the Marines have landed they have left behind nations ruled by
wealthy and corrupt establishments while most of the people remain mired in
poverty and ready to join drug dealing organizations or terrorist groups. How else can they get any respect or any
is in fact an international economic system which can correctly be called legalized looting. The rip
off system of economy and government.
Calling it corruption is
misleading because it implies that wholesomeness and integrity is the
norm. In fact, corruption is the
norm. It isn't just that the system is corrupt, rather,
corruption is the system, corruption defines the system.
2005 book by Ronald W. Baker, Capitalism's
Achilles Heel Dirty Money and How to Renew the Free-Market
System, documents the whole sale corruption which has impoverished all of
Africa, Asia and South America. Mr.
Baker went to Nigeria in the 1960s and started a business there immediately
after he graduated from the Harvard Business School. And encountered that system of bribery and
corruption which has engulfed the whole of Africa in the wake of liberation. Corrupt governing groups deal drugs, steal
mineral wealth and then launder the money through the international banking
system. They steal the money loaned by
the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, stash it in Swiss bank
accounts or the Cayman Islands and leave the wretched people of the country
owing the money.
Baker still believes in Capitalism. He did anyway when he first went to Nigeria
as a dewy-eyed graduate of Harvard Business School. In fact he still has a somewhat naive faith
in it. It seems to be all he has by way
of a religion. At the end of the book he
argues that Adam Smith envisioned Capitalism
as a moral system but that it was
corrupted by the utilitarianism of
Jeremy Bentham. And he believes it can
be Reformed. Somehow.
that argument is worth, Baker admits that the international capitalist system has been entirely
corrupted and produced a terrible poverty all over the world. He documents how much dirty money from looted mineral wealth, businesses which rely upon
the bribery of corrupt officials and drug cartels is routinely laundered by American and European banks
and stashed in secret off shore accounts.
And he shows how much poverty and misery has engulfed the looted
countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America as a consequence.
is the value of his book. He went to the
trouble to research the corruption found in some 60 countries all over the
world and the ways by which money from it is laundered by western banks along
with the money from drug cartels.
Trillions of dollars from sovereign wealth funds, oil revenues, public
pension funds, officials who loot the treasury and drug cartels etc. find their
way into investment funds where stolen paper wealth can be converted into
basic characteristic of economies and governments all over the world is
wholesale corruption. The Transparency International web site has
Global Corruption Reports documenting the billions which have been pocketed by
the governing parties of Nigeria, Angola, Kenya, Pakistan, Gabon, Zimbabwe,
Ivory Coast, Congo. With the help of
Western banks and corporations. I came, I saw, I looted is the motto of
international free market capitalism.
where Mr. Baker tried to do business, ranks as one of the most corrupt
countries in the world. But the whole of
Africa has descended into desperate poverty and violent chaos because of the
looting of the elites who are assisted by Western corporations and banks. A BBC 10-23-12 story about Nigeria describes
the daily theft of 180,000 barrels of
oil. They can't figure out how the
thieves are getting away with it.
Inspector Closeau is on the job with a dolphin trained to track the oil
tankers. Well, it would be funny if the
terrible poverty of the people of Nigeria were funny.
the poverty of Africa
hopeless poverty and rampant violent crime which now afflicts South Africa is as bad as anything they
suffered under apartheid. It is worse really, because the rest of the
world has lost interest in their plight.
They have fallen out of fashion now that it is blacks mistreating
blacks. African Liberation is supposed to have ended the miseries of Africa instead
of making them worse. So their situation
no longer fits western ideologies.
Bishop Tutu has moved on to global
warming as his main cause. As
elsewhere, a corrupt governing party lives in luxury while most of the people
don't have clean water or electricity or safety or enough food.
Kenya features Kibera--the largest slum in Africa, where children trade sex for
food. Kibera now has one nurse to serve
the population. They don't even have
clean drinking water. Meanwhile, Members
of Parliament are paid 9300 pounds a month.
Hundreds of millions in British foreign aid has been stolen.
was the backing of the American CIA that allowed Joseph Mobutu to hang on to
power in the Congo. He and his supporters went on to steal $ 5
billion. And plunged the Congo into
endless civil wars which have killed 5 million and caused 5 million rapes. There seems to be no country in Africa which
does not have 1. a wholly corrupt governing party 2. a mass of poor people 3. who are often the victims of criminal and
military violence directly connected to the looting.
Baker shows, this relentless looting is facilitated by Western corporations and
by the policies of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which
persist in making loans to notoriously corrupt governments. The money gets stolen and those who never
received it are liable for it. The
British bank HSBC has agreed to pay a $ 1.9 billion fine for laundering money
for drug cartels like the Sinaloa Cartel of Mexico. For years this bank has been laundering money
for one of the cartels which is responsible for the violence in Mexico which,
along with the poverty, drives the Mexicans to escape any way they can. The Mexican bail out back in 1995 cost the
U.S. $ 50 billion. It was the international corporations who
were saved, not the poor people of Mexico.
The opening of a giant new oil field in Mexico in the 1970s was supposed
to alleviate the poverty of Mexico. It
did the opposite. All the money went
into the pockets of the governing party and their supporters.
cannot insulate its prosperity from the poverty of the rest of the world. Historically, the U.S. has had a major share
of the responsibility for the poverty of Mexico. And will never stop the flow of desperately
poor migrants coming north until it finds a way to address poverty in
Mexico. Of course that was the false
promise of NAFTA. All they need is
so-called free market capitalism. The American Coast Guard turns back those who
try to escape from Haiti. The relentless
and hopeless poverty of Haiti is the result of perennially corrupt
entrenched corruption of Spain and Italy and Greece is the major reason for the
collapse of those economies, which offer no future for the young people of
those countries. The usual partnership
of unscrupulous corporations and larcenous politicians has systematically
diverted the wealth of the country. See
the New York Times of Feb 16 2013
A4 In Spain, Graft Inquiry is Widening re: traditions of institutionalized graft exposed by the downturn in
it isn't just the people at the top who are dishonest. Dishonesty pervades the population. Dishonesty has long since reached epidemic
proportions in most of the world's economy.
Anyone who tries to stay honest is surrounded by those who will take
advantage. Everybody does it is the universal motto.
Communist and Capitalist Corruption
under the Czars had a large and corrupt bureaucracy and military establishment. Under the Communists, the bureaucracy grew
larger and more corrupt. Now that the
Communists no longer run things, old fashioned Capitalist Corruption has
re-emerged. The arguments about systems are irrelevant when there is a
universal system of looting which
persists regardless of prevailing ideology.
primary feature of Communist China has been a large corrupt bureaucracy,
facilitated by totalitarian control and the absence of an independent
press. Now that capitalism has returned, the old restrictions have been thrown off
and the corruption has been multiplied.
An article in the New York Times for October 26th 2012 shows how Prime
Minister Wen Jiabao and his family have made billions via free enterprises facilitated by government connections. Although he has done it under protest as it
were--In the winter of 2007, just before
he began his second term as prime minister, Wen Jiabao called for new measures
to fight corruption, particularly among high-ranking officials. Which will leave more for himself and his
America we have less corruption because we have more lawyers. The corporation lawyers and lobbyists go to
Washington, sit down with the Congressmen and work out deals which make that
legal which before was not legal. If it
is even half way legal, the corporations can take it from there. They expect to be in court suing and being
sued and they have legal establishments already set up to take care of it.
is more scrutiny of the corruption in America because of an independent
press. The muckrakers of the 19th century exposed the graft of New York and
Chicago and other American cities where political establishments systematically
looted the public treasury in what was accurately described as a spoils system. Tammany Hall and Boss Tweed. But as soon as the media spotlight is
switched off, the mice come out again.
In the late 1980s, during the third term of Mayor Ed Koch, a whole
series of trials showed how corruption pervades various departments. City workers have long since mastered the
art of ripping off the taxpayers by exploiting the vices of the
when the Mayor does not personally enrich himself, which was true of Mayor
Daley in Chicago and Ed Koch in New York, corruption pervades the municipal
bureaucracies he supposedly supervises.
The legendary stories like that of Huey Long in Louisiana distract us
from the less flamboyant and routine corruption of our cities.
I was in New York in the 1970s the garbage men would head for the dump with
half a load and call it a day. The
social workers would sit upstairs reading the Racing Form while their clients
waited in long lines. The police
officers would report for duty and then park some place and take a nap. The city clerical staff would come late,
leave early and take two hours for lunch.
are not all that shocked and indignant when they read of municipal
corruption. The reaction of the average
person is 1. mild indignation 2. a
shrug--I'd probably do the same if I got
the chance 3. a question:
how can I get in on it ? That is why the spirit of easy money and the rip off shows up at every level of the American economy. Auto mechanics and plumbers, roofers and
repair men are only as honest as they are made to be. If Diogenes went looking for an honest
workman his lantern would run out of kerosene before he found one. Under the new health care system, doctors
have become as larcenous as lawyers. At
the higher levels of the bureaucracy, where there isn't the same
self-interested scrutiny, the rip off is destroying the system. The runaway cost of health care and health
insurance is the result of fraud and rip offs at every level. Billions are being stolen from Medicare and
it is on the way to bankruptcy.
the doctrine of 99 per cent righteous
are indebted to the late Occupy Wall
Street movement for a definition of what is wrong with the U.S.
economy. Even if it is the wrong
definition, it helps to bring into focus the question as to who or what is to
blame for the half collapsed economy.
definition says in effect that the one per cent richest are to blame while the
other 99 per cent of us are not to blame--we are the victims. 1 per cent of us are rich but not righteous. The remaining 99 per cent of us are righteous
because we don't belong to the 1 per cent.
that you are beat up by the gang of 9
on your way home. You have a just claim
to be a martyr. But suppose that your
group of nine is beat up by the gang of 1
on your way home from school. Wouldn't
you be embarrassed to mention it ?
99 per cent of the population have allowed themselves to be mugged by the
wealthiest 1 per cent of the population, what can anybody do about it ? If they did it once, they'll do it twice ! We're Doomed !
the other hand, if the 99 per cent of us who are righteous but not rich can
arrive at a show down with the 1 per cent who are rich but not righteous, why
can't we make them share the wealth ? We hardly need to vote-- Resolved: that Oprah Winfrey, Tiger Woods and Lebron
James should divvy up with the rest of us . . . motion
carried by acclamation ! Instead of
occupying the park, we will camp out on Oprah's estate until she brings us all
barbecue. Then move on to the next
the 99 per cent could easily pass a total tax on the 1 per cent and then live
happily ever after, an explanation is wanting as to why we haven't already done
it. The most recent tax increase on the
top 2 per cent seems to imply that only 98 per cent of us are righteous.
fact the list of those who are to blame for our broken down economy should
include a much larger percentage. Those
who make a living by honest work in America are not 99 per cent of the
population. More like 9 per cent. Those who participate in parasite practices
and the rip off make up the other 91
the past 150 years Wall Street has worked out 1001 ways to cheat and they still
come up with something new every week.
But everybody and his brother wants a piece of the action if he can get
it. Most Americans are invested in the stock market directly or
indirectly. They all share the Wall
Street faith of wealth without work via so-called investing. Jeremiah 6.13
says For from the least to the greatest
of them, every one is greedy for unjust gain. That accurately describes our society and
largely explains the major cause of the recent financial crash.
are still stuck with the simple minded Marxist dictum that society is divided
into two classes, one of which exploits the other. In fact there are more like 20 classes in
society. All of which pursue their
interest as best they can by seeking favors from the government. And as
individuals, we all rip off the best we can.
The 65 per cent on the top rip off the 35 per cent on the bottom. Who rip them off when they get the chance. We have reached the point where everyone gets
a government check. Some checks are
larger than others, that's the difference.
And the day is coming when the checks will bounce.
is true that people with a lot of money take advantage of those with less
money. It is also true that those
with less money take advantage of those
with more when they get the chance. At
street level, the fellows with no money will rob or steal from whomever. Those who are poor prey upon other poor
people as readily as they prey upon those who have more than they do. Those at the bottom are as predatory as those
at the top, or more so--they have to be.
It is just that their opportunities to rip off their fellows produce
in the comics, it isn't the billionaire who steals the cans of the can
collector. A rival can collector does
that. The billionaire pursues bigger
prey. Or spends it on philanthropy. When there is nothing left you want to buy,
you can still buy respect.
Smith says that Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of
property, is in reality instituted for the defence of the rich against the
poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all. [ WN
674 ] The rich have always defended
themselves from revolution by buying off those who seriously threaten their
position. Most people have some property to protect. And have no confidence that they could
expropriate the property of the rich
without the risk of having their own property expropriated. Adam Smith was bought off by the Duke with a
life time pension and an easy money
sinecure in the government bureaucracy.
Adam Smith's time there were only 3000 voters in England. The franchise was limited to white men with a
lot of property. In America, everyone
gets to vote. In Chicago, even the
ghosts get to vote. Which means that the
welfare state will inevitably expand beyond the Merchants and Manufacturers of Adam Smith's day who extorted protections and subsidies from
Parliament. But why be indignant when
the masses do what the Merchants do ?
The result is smaller checks but a lot more of them. Wars lead to pay offs for soldiers who
survive. The class of those who have some property has become
a very large category in America. Most
of the population. The expectation that
the Middle Class is ready to join the revolution is silly.
a rip off society
live in a rip off society. A society
which is structured to facilitate the rip off.
The rip off gets built into business practices. It defines the housing market. It gets written into union contracts and out
of court settlements. Federal, State and
City governments operate on what is basically bribery even though it isn't
called that. It ceases to be bribery when it becomes standard
Occupy Wall Street movement camped out in city park to push the millionaires to
agree to disgorge their ill-gotten gains.
They didn't realize that millionaires don't hang out in city parks and
were therefore free from any pressure to disgorge. The media propped it up as best they could
but it succumbed to natural causes like inept rabble rousing and silly
failed to recognize that the unions are part of the rip off, not the
alternative to it. What is really wanted
is a way to pressure the 91 per cent to somehow give up the rip off and the easy money. Which is not
likely to happen. But there is a small
percentage of society which could find the way to an honest economy when they
understand what they are up against.
wrong with the American economy is Americans--it's us. It's what we do and what we don't do. We don't do honest and useful work. Instead we get hold of positions, safe
sinecures in the bureaucracy. We make
money off money--we try to do it and go broke trying. We are all like the farmer going into the
tavern and losing his crop money at the poker table. You
can't cheat an honest man. We get
cheated by trying to cheat others.
society in which people insisted upon doing an honest day's work at a useful
trade in return for fair wages would be a revolutionary society. Which is why those who are serious about
having an honest economy have to build one.
Not from scratch because there
are honest workers and honest businesses which provide some foundation. But there has to be as much independence as possible from most of
the hopelessly corrupt establishment we now have. cf. in
the world but notofit.
the lottery economy
anyone succeed in America ? Yes ! And we have numerous stories which illustrate
that proposition. Parallel Question: Can anyone win the lottery ? Yes !
And we have numerous stories which illustrate that proposition. The follow up question is: can everyone succeed in America ? The parallel follow up question is: can everyone
win the lottery ? And the answer is
no. For everyone who wins a million
there have to be about two million who lose a dollar, because half the money
stays with the sponsor of the lottery.
question about America is harder to answer, because it is a more complex sort
of lottery. It isn't just luck. There is a lot of room for using influence
etc. And it isn't just a zero sum game like the poker table. But the obvious fact is this: the more people there are who get rich
without working, the more people there will be whose wages are in effect substantially
reduced. It is a kind of poker table
economy in which those who win do so at the expense of those who lose.
basic part of the false faith in the American Economy is that we can all get
ahead via college. We can all become
members of the affluent society via 6 years of college while embracing free trade with a world in which
millions of people are eager to work for a third of what we expect to get. This is the current version of The American Dream. It is the false faith of much of the rest of
the world also. We can all join the
privileged class by investing a small fortune in getting a college degree. It did halfway work 60 years ago, and it
still works for some, but for most it is a bad
Spain and Italy and Greece more than half of the college graduates have no
jobs. Have moved back in with their
parents. The chance for these young
people to start a family has been put on hold indefinitely. They only have enough money for the beer
garden. It encourages irresponsibility
and that what the hell lifestyle
which is so conspicuous among modern young people. A lifestyle which absolutely requires
contraception and abortion.
years ago, a college degree was a ticket which admitted you to the privileged
class. Now it is more of a lottery
ticket. You might get there but the privileged
class is steadily shrinking while the competition keeps growing. So you wind up thousands of dollars in debt
with no realistic prospect of paying it off any time soon. And the money could have bought a house or
launched a business. Getting into the
privileged class via a College diploma is part of that American Dream--that big
illusion--in which so many Americans, and so many Europeans are now
people are suckered by the deceptive advertising of these for-profit vocational
colleges which rely upon government loans.
After running into debt, their graduates discover that they are no
closer to a job than they were when they started. Having wasted all that time, they now have a
debt to pay.
fact is that we can't all join the privileged class. We can't all be high salaried professionals or find a life time sinecure in the
government bureaucracy. Those government
bureaucracies are also currently down-sizing. Putting your faith in this system is the equivalent of putting your
faith in your lottery ticket. Except
that it only takes a week to become disillusioned with the lottery ticket. Years of your life may go by before you are
forced to give up your faith in the system.
cite statistics showing how much more you will make in a life time if you have
a college degree versus if you don't.
But those figures compare apples and onions--compare those who hang out
in college dormitories smoking dope and fornicating versus those who hang out
on street corners smoking dope and trying to fornicate. If you take the money you would have spent on
college and invest it in a farm or a business or a house, you have a much
better chance at making a living then if you try to meet the increasingly tough
competition of the down-sizing bureaucracies.
If you work at making a living for yourself instead of hanging out at
one of those high class flop houses
called colleges for 4 years, you have
a head start on life.
people have been sold the illusion that, despite mass poverty all over the
world, we can all find a position in one
of the bureaucracies or arrive at wealth with very little labor in the great
world of international capitalism.
College: the road to
has increasingly become a road to no where in the modern economy. In fact it is often a road to ruin. Young people saddled with heavy debt which
will take them years to pay, even if they find a job. Increasingly, many of them cannot.
the 19th century there was a privileged class which went to college at Daddy's
expense and which then had easy access to good jobs. There was a brief period in the 20th century
when admission to an expanding privileged class was granted to those not born
into it via going to college. The
modern faith is that we can all get good jobs after going to college at
government expense. We can all join the
privileged class. It is a false faith
which is rapidly eroding. We have to
find an alternative--create an alternative economy which is independent of this
bankrupt system upon which we are now so dependent.
is true that you have to work three times as hard to succeed if you give up on
finding an easy money sinecure. But, if
you are serious about making a success of your life, you are better off
quitting that road which has been blocked by a bad accident and a miles long
back up. That describes the modern
Education versus College
has to do with getting a job credential.
It is a great waste of time and money and youth if there is no job
waiting. It has no real connection with
learning or education properly
so-called. College mainly produces a lot
of sophmores--which means wise fools--who have the illusion that
they are educated because they went
to college. What they study in college
is of no value if it does not provide a usable job credential.
all in favor of continuing education and free education for all. Get a library card and take out some
books. Read War and Peace. Read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Read A
Terrible Glory by James Donovan, a first rate history of Custer and the
battle of the Little Big Horn. Read Bury the Chains by Adam Hochschild, a
first rate history of the Abolition movement.
The endless time-wasting and expensive pursuit of pseudo-learning at
college, of job credentials that do not lead to a job, especially when you have
to borrow the money to pay for it, is a
fool's errand. Down With College !
and Down With Borrowing ! Up With Learning ! and Up with the Library ! should be our slogans. Borrow
books, Not money will fit on a picket sign.
the right to life and property
Declaration of Independence says that every man has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The original Virginia version said life, liberty and property. A more precise formulation which avoids silly
assumptions about how happy people can be working on the railroad for $ 1 a
day, or singing while they slave in the tobacco fields of Mr. Jefferson or
right to property--to some property--is
a necessary corollary of the right to life.
By property, I do not mean a
10,000 acre plantation and 200 slaves like Thomas Jefferson had. I mean rather sufficient stuff, whether by way of land or stock or tools, so that you can make a living without depending
upon the government--joining the army--or having no other option except to work
for the Coal Company. cf. I owe my soul to the Company store.
the right to property has to be limited. The limit comes from the fact that other
people have the right to life and the right to property. Jefferson's property in slaves violated the
rights of those people to their lives.
His occupying of a 10,000 acre estate which was the gift of a corrupt
legislature to his father, a tract of land that he could not even begin to work
himself, is also an obvious violation of the right to property of other men who
were landless because of it. The great
estates into which much of Virginia was divided were patterned upon the great
estates into which most of England was divided, which were also originally
grants from the royal government. The
Dukes did no work and received most of the revenue. The laborers did the work and received a
G.K. Chesterton argued in the outline
of sanity: One
would think, to hear people talk, that the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers
were on the side of property. But
obviously they are the enemies of property because they are enemies of their
own limitations. They do not want their
own land; but other people's . . . It is the negation of property that the Duke
of Sutherland should have all the farms in one estate; just as it would be the
negation of marriage if he had all our wives in one harem. Chesterton also argued that what we
call Capitalism ought to be called Proletarianism. The point of it is not that some people have
capital, but that most people only have wages because they do not have capital.
Capitalism and Socialism, Chesterton argued for Distributism: we all have a
basic right as individuals to the property we need to live. A right which was effectively negated by the
Duke who owned half the County or the Texas Cattle King who claimed a million
acres and used his hired gunmen to run off the Homesteaders. You had the right to work for him or find
another County. Now many of the world's
young people are seeking another Country, just as so many have had to do in the
past. If you don't have access to the
corrupt governing class, you have no future in the Country of your birth. Between 1811 and 1820, the Duke of Sutherland
cleared 15,000 tenants off his estates
in the Highlands of Scotland to make way for deer forests and grouse moors.
is no mandate for equality in
Nature. The mandate for equality in the
French Revolution led to chopping off the heads of the aristocrats who had
lived in luxury while the peasants starved.
No one demands equality with
the rag picker or the can collector. We
want equality with the Duke. The only
valid mandate comes from a parent who at least pretends not to play favorites
and thereby makes herself liable to the charge of unequal treatment: Jimmy got to go, why can't I go ? But when we try that argument on the Senator,
he may justly respond: He gave me a nice
fat envelope. What did you give me ?
when one man owns half the county and other landless men work as laborers on
his estate--if they are lucky--there is a denial of natural justice in this
situation. One man owns 100 houses and
100 families pay him rent--or a monthly mortgage payment. How did that come about from a time when each
family owned its own tepee or thatched hut or sod house ?
Castro delivers a 6 hour speech while everyone gathered in the square listens
attentively. You better listen since
informers are every where and under cover police circulate through the crowd. It is best not to yawn or smirk. Is this a wonderful example of The Right of Free Speech ? Obviously, Mr. Castro's excessive assertion
of his right of free speech effectively negates the free speech right of
everyone else. You have the right to
remain silent--to Shut Up and Listen !
Rand insisted upon the absolute and unlimited right to property. And insisted upon the right to abortion as a
woman's absolute right. But there is an
obvious fallacy in the argument that a
woman has the right to do what she wants with her own body. Because there are two bodies involved in an abortion.
Whether or not the embryo child has a soul and whether or not she is a
citizen, she has a live body which
will cease to live when the abortion is finished.
principle in common law is that your right to swing your arm freely ends where
someone else's face begins. My right to
do what I want with my body is limited by the presence of someone
else's body. I have the right to drive my car down the
road. But I don't have the right to run
over other people trying to use the road.
I have a limited
right--limited by the rights of others.
basic premises of Christian society are that a person is a person no matter how small and that everyone has the right to a birthday. An embryo child is a small person who has the
right to a birthday. A society which
does not respect that right has abandoned any claim to be a just society.
the right to make a living
beyond that, the right to life must necessarily include the right to make a living. Unless that means the right to a government
job or a job with the great corporation it has to mean the right to a share of the stuff which God and Nature
have provided--some minimum of land
and stock which will allow you to
support a family. It doesn't just mean
the right to a minimum wage job. The
right to live implies the right to work at something and the right to have something
to work with. Instead of being a wage
slave forever dependent upon the government or the corporation.
right to property is necessarily connected to the right to life. Every new mouth that comes into the world
brings with it a pair of hands which can feed that mouth if
those hands can get hold of a share of what God put here as His
providence for all of us. If you have
the right to be here, you have the right to what you need to go on living
here. Which means something beyond a
packing crate at the edge of the dump and the right to scavenge for your
the right to have a family
the right to life, there is the right to have a family. Which requires much more than a subsistence
wage job or a government welfare check.
A man has a right to make a living for his family. A family has a right to a house. We have some obligation to see that they get
it, or at least that we are not the cause of them losing it.
isn't so much that we have an obligation in charity to provide a family with a
house, but we do have an obligation in justice to avoid depriving them of their
house. Which is just what these complex
wealth pursuing systems bring about. In
much of the world people have been pushed out of their villages and wind up
living in a packing crate at the garbage dump of some giant city.
America, thousands of people are losing their homes. Which may be partly at least their own fault,
since they kept borrowing against the inflated equity created by runaway speculation. But when we participate in these wealth without work schemes we also
become complicit in the process which puts families out on the street.
the primitive human community, no one had to pay a mortgage on his tepee or
thatched hut or sod house. In fact your neighbors
have a traditional obligation to help you build it. That obligation does not fall upon the
government. It falls upon us as
individuals, especially if we claim to be Christians.
test of any society, whether it is a just
society or not, is how far it facilitates the right of the common man to
support a family. When he is stuck at a
subsistence wage job which allows a single person to survive, when his one good
alternative is to join the army and hazard life and limb in some foreign
conflict, he has been effectively deprived of his basic right.
was a time 60 years ago when most Americans had the chance to get a family
wage. It still excluded a substantial
part of the population, including much of the black population. But, unlike today, it wasn't that hard for
anyone willing to work to find a family
wage which would allow him to support a family by working a 40 hour
week. Otherwise his wife has to work or
he has to work double shifts and never see his kids.
opportunity has steadily eroded over the past 60 years. It is now the case that only a minority of
Americans can expect to find a family
wage. We can blame the government
for that and we can blame the corporations for that but first we have to blame
ourselves--have to take responsibility for the erosion of the foundations of
family life by our pursuit of wealth and luxury. [ See
Adam Smith and Family Wage for more
on this subject. ]
de facto way we have to rely upon one another to acknowledge our right. Your life and your property are only as safe
as your neighbors' willingness to respect them.
Those who acknowledge that responsibility have to find a way to
establish a society which is independent of all those others who do not. We cannot put our trust in the government, or
in the corporation, or in the Capitalist System. We have rather to find those in whom we can
trust, because they share our values, the values that were once found in the
original Christian community--whether they call themselves Christians or not.
A Foolish Faith
in 1928, President Herbert Hoover proclaimed that We in America are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever
before in the history of any land. We
have not reached the goal, but, given a chance to go forward with the policies
of the last eight years, we shall soon with the help of God be in sight of the
day when poverty will be banished from this nation. He won by an overwhelming majority. The stock market boomed. Then it collapsed and there ensued the 10
year long Great Depression which was only ended by the runaway spending and the
exportation of manpower of World War II.
next President to promise an end to poverty was Lyndon Johnson who declared a
War on Poverty after he was elected by a landslide in 1964. He continued the War in Vietnam anyway. That prevented a lot of unemployment.
in the American economy, which now means a faith in the world economy to which
it is tied by a thousand chains, is a fool's faith. There has only been one society which
actually abolished poverty: Acts
4.34 There was not a needy person among them. They proved it could be done.
wealth without work
Smith used stock as a synonym for capital.
And it brings out the idea that a few chickens, or a sack of wheat seed,
or canned goods with which you can stock
the shelves of your store are a necessary foundation for making a living on
your own. Instead of using money to make
money, you get hold of some stock and
use it to make your labor fruitful. You
invest in your own labor instead of trying to make a profit off the labor of
others. Which is the definition of usury:
reaping where you did not sow, and taking up what you did not lay
down. Luke 19.21
definition of stock has nothing in
common with the stock market where
money changes hands in the same way it does in a gambling casino. On Wall Street, work is just another 4 letter word to be avoided. The common feature of the financial system is
a super structure of executives and board members who meet in air conditioned
rooms and never work up a sweat. Plus
stock holders who don't even bother to attend the meeting.
is a common progression in the economic system whereby moneyed men go on from 1. making or producing or building
something to 2. owning factories or organizing
enterprises in which others do the actual productive work to 3.
shipping and trading goods made by others
to 4. loaning the money to
5. buying stock in enterprises
launched by others and financed by others.
Beyond investing, there is day trading and speculating, and beyond that there is betting on something to
fail--all the varieties of short-selling
and vampire capitalism.
that enables those who never did any of this to begin at the end, as it were,
by investing their money. Or, more
often, turning it over to a hedge fund manager to invest. They still take the risk, it is said, but that is what insurance is for--such
as-credit default swaps--leading to
an ideal world in which you make lots of money with no work and no risk. You don't even have to think about it, unless
you made a mistake when you selected the hedge
are 1001 ways to make money without working for it--without doing much of
anything that could be described as useful work. There are all those positions where putting
in your time is euphemistically called work. And then there is real useful work which is
extravagantly over paid for one reason or another.
Socialism soon arrives at the same old place as capitalism where those who do the most
work get the smallest reward and those who do little or no work are compensated
just because of the positions they occupy.
In a world in which so many people are so desperately poor, it isn't
that hard to trace a connection between the one thing and the other. And the obvious label for it is injustice.
defines usury as unjust
gain and shows the connection with poverty: 28.8 He
that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for
him that will pity the poor.
15 asks: Who shall dwell in thy holy hill ? . . . He that putteth not out his money to usury.
6.13 does not limit his indictment to the few.
He says rather For from the least to the greatest of them,
every one is greedy for unjust gain.
He could be describing modern America instead of ancient Israel. If the rip off were the work of the few, it
could soon be remedied. When so many are
engaged in it or waiting for the chance to jump in, there is no easy way to fix
it. That is where the necessity for
building an alternate economy comes from.
16.4 prophesies: the extortioner is at an end, the spoiler ceaseth, the oppressors are
consumed out of the land. A good
prophecy but when will it come true ?
22.12 says thou hast taken usury and
increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbours by extortion, and
hast forgotten me, saith the Lord God.
Extortion is used in the gospels and the
epistles as the label for those who get money from money instead of working for
it. Matthew 23.25 for ye
make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full
of extortion and excess
tells us not to keep company . . . with
an extortioner, with such an one no not to eat
1 Co 5.10-11 and in
6.10 says nor
extortioners shall inherit the Kingdom of God.
was a point of pride for Paul that he continued to work at his tent making
trade instead of asking the various Christian communities to support him. Paul insisted upon work as the necessary
foundation of the Christian community--Ephesians 4.28 Let him
that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the
thing that is good 1
Thessalonians 4.11 work
with your own hands, as we commanded you;
12 That ye may walk honestly toward them that are without, and that ye may
have lack of nothing. 2
Thessalonians 3.10 If any one will not
work, let him not eat. For we hear that
some of you are living in idleness, mere busybodies, not doing any work. Now such persons we command and exhort in the
Lord Jesus Christ to do their work in quietness and to earn their own
living. In 3.14 he tells them to have nothing to do with such people. Which re-inforces what he says about no fellowship with extortioners. It is a necessary condition for building an
alternate economy which is based upon honest work and which shuns usury and those who live by it.
[ The original of this article, The Unjust Economy, is pages
59 to 88 of Letter
to the Bishops ]